My Life as an Orange

September 14, 2008

Why, pray tell?

It’s all about the duality of man.
We’re all oranges, in one way or another. Except, perhaps, for a precious few who live a life true to what they stand for.

Oh, lame.

It is I, Joshua Welsh, Mechanical Service Technician by day, Philosopher by night. Full time lover…
(hehehe GROSS)

Ok.
Preach peace but only as an outcome of war.
Fill your car with biofuel to save the planet, but starve half of Africa as a result.
Devote your life to a ‘religion’ of nonviolent outcomes, but play football.

Aggressive like the tiger, gentle like the lamb.

Assertive, but passive.

My life as an orange was suggested by my ex-girlfriend.

“There’s two Josh’s,” she said.
“There’s the one that has fun at parties and the one that goes for church.”

Fortunate for both of us, really. We were completely wrong for each other.
But was she onto something?

I’d never had the thought that I could be double minded. I’d go out, albeit very occasionally, have too much to drink, then some random would come up to me and start asking me questions which would inavertantly lead to me explaining christianity. It was the perfect mix! how could I go wrong? Some of my best preaching was getting done with a wiskey in my hand! (very occasionally, of course!)
So why double mindedness? It’s kinda plaguing my brain right now. I didn’t quite have it all sorted out.

I DID have the understanding of me becoming like the Romans to win the Romans, something which is a powerful tool in Christian and secular circles. It’s probably the most powerful advertising tool you can use.
(Cue Homer: “I’m a guy like me!”)
But I DIDN’T have the understanding of living a life of purity. I mean, I wasn’t a violent drunk or anything, my demeanor didn’t actually change that much. But I wasn’t doing things the right way. I was acting upon my own wisdom, and probably out of some rebellion issues, some hurt of never being part of my friends drunken parties (which is ridiculous, but it all had an effect to some point), and a few other insecurities.

In primary school I never thought I had many friends.
The older I get, the more I see that there was plenty of people who would’ve happily called me their friend, if only I’d talked to them. I was incredibly nervous around people that I didn’t know well.
Walking past, say, a couple of random girls, was somewhat traumatic. I’d never know where to look! Should I smile? Should I say hi? Should I pretend to be preoccupied? What if I did something wrong? What if they laughed? It doesn’t take much teasing or rejection to validate any of these thoughts. Hang out with a few jerks (football clubs tend to attract fairly exclusive types when you’re young. So does school, actually) who’ll shut you down in front of people to validate themselves, and before you know it you’ll be so backwards in coming forward to people that you’ll need rear view mirrors to walk to the shops.

But it’s not reality. Well, it might be at the time, but things change, and primary school isn’t a dictation of how your life is going to turn out.
Praise God for that. Because insecurities can make you downright nasty.
Before you know it, you’re second guessing everyone, and assuming that everyone who wants to do something for you is just setting you up. So you very quickly trust no-one: it’s one of those nice habits you learn from living in the jungle.

Like a pencil that reaches the bottom of the page, I seem to have lost my point.

Oh yes. All of these things can lead to dualities within yourself.
I was effectively a very nice young lad, who was known by most as that, while I had anger problem almost no-one knew about. My best friend at the time new of it well. He’d use it from time to time, just to see what I’d do.
All he needed to do was take something that i wanted (like my bicycle or those little plastic raquets we used to play with at lunch time) and I would, full on EXPLODE. It was so ridiculous! He was just mucking around! Anyone except for me could see that.

So. The oddest little things in my childhood had begun to dictate my adulthood. I still, deep down, wanted to be cool. And accepted. Even though, as I’ve since found out, I was.
Accepted, anyway. The amount of people who’ve come out of the woodwork that know me (and like me, surprisingly) is utterly ridiculous, considering I didn’t even go to secondary school.
So the main fear in my life, which was that of not being accepted, turned out to be a complete farce.
And my problem with things being taken from me (or missing out on things) turned out to be irrelevant.

And yet, even though I knew that, it dictated my life.

So. Duality is bad. You can’t serve two masters, or influences, if you like. One has to win.

And I’ve found serving one can be rather adventageous. Two reasons spring to mind:

1: It makes things a bit simpler.
You don’t have to please everyone anymore!

2: Everyone else can get stuffed.
If what you do upsets someone, and doesn’t upset your master, you don’t have to care.
So relax. The only time I ever see what’s wrong with my life is when I pull back, rest, and have a good look around. And then all of my problems seem obvious, and quite fixable.

That’s all for now.

7 Responses to “My Life as an Orange”

  1. Adam Says:

    Hmmmm… perhaps in the world but not of it?

    Is it just a matter of being yourself? That way you can be of a single mind. More confident. Assertive. Guided.

    Whilst I appreciate the dualities thing, I’m not sure that I totally get it. For one, whilst it would make things simpler it may actually cause harm if you can’t meet someone half way on a certain point. I know some fundamentalist types who would say to someone with a particular emotional or mental illness that it was ‘the devil’. That type of overly simplistic catergorisation of ‘either it good and it’s of God, or if it’s not it must be the devil himself’, is rather short-sighted. Perhaps, this isn’t what you’re talking about though. But, in the case that it is, I shall continue. In terms of living life from a single mind, you can be somewhat of a superman on one had, but be totally isolating to whoever you are relating to. So much of life exists in tension with some conflicting ideal. Even to act with God as your reference point is tough work and never in a single direction. So, I think I would have to disagree to some degree on your second point. That depends upon how much one’s single-mindedness can interfere negatively upon another.

    Aahhh.. I think I was having more of a whinge than adding any constructive response. I agree, however, that insecurities picked up from childhood can dictate how you act as an adult. That seems fairly normal. The process of transformation (which is what I think you’re advocating) that renews your character and behaviour from bad to good etc, takes a lifetime. I think it’s a matter of finding a natural desire to be yourself. Transformation allows you to be your true self – not some fabricated idea picked up from the people around. “Freedom is doing what you want to do, and doing what you want to do is what you ought do” -John Piper. Transformation involves freedom. Both are natural and should never be enforced, but rather found and nurtured. CS Lewis makes some great points in the last chapter of Mere Christianity.

    I think I’m done now. Ta.

  2. joshuism Says:

    Indeed.
    Single mindedness is only beneficial to others if you’re actually obeying God. Excellent point. I didn’t really make this feeling clear, but it probably doesn’t matter as the only people who have ever read my posts have been christians. This way of viewing life is only simpler if you have a good understanding of the freedoms of christ. Which is tricky.
    It was more… autobiographical than anything else. I’ve been thinking a lot about my life lately, and why I do the things I do.
    Like speeding, for example. I speed because A: I’m being an idiot P-plater (which I’m not any more) or B: because I’m running late. A friend showed me one day that my speeding was because i didn’t trust God. If I trusted God, than I’d trust him to get me where I needed to go right when he wanted me there. When I had this revelation, I drove from my house through geelong, picked up a trailer, and drove to torquay in less than 45 minutes, without breaking the speed limit. I only got one red light the whole way, which turned green when I was slowing down for it. And, of course, I arrived right on time.
    this is an irrelevant, however interesting story.
    Mere Christianity is one seriously thick book. A single page can take quite some time to digest. In my mind it’s the ultimate toilet book because you need a quiet place to read without interruptions, and you don’t want to read more than a little bit anyway because of the chance of your head exploding.
    Did you hear that? I think I just heard someone rolling over in their grave…

  3. Adam Says:

    What about the emergency services – can they follow that rule and expect to arrive right on time?

  4. Adam Says:

    Obeying God? Which God? Which interpretation? How do you know you are obeying his will exactly?

  5. Joshua Says:

    don’t be a dork.
    if you’re following God, then you’d be doing your work ‘as unto the Lord’.
    besides. how do you know God exists? the same way you know whether or not you’re obeying him.

  6. Adam Says:

    I resemble that comment.
    Did I go too far? I’m sorry. I felt for a minute there that I was in a philosophy tutorial.

    I think my point really was that sometimes we need others to realise where we stand in relation to God. We don’t live in some isolated bubble with just us and the Lord. So to say that it doesn’t matter what you do ‘as long as you’re following God’ is problematic. It is true in a theoretical sense. But what happens when christians have different conceptions on how to follow God? What happens when they conflict with each other? Do we hold firm to our knowledge and mind bent even if it causes the other grief? For me, personally, I think we can learn a lot from one another. I think learning to live with other people is a crucial part of following God. I’m not trying to say that everybody should like you. But we are called to be peacemakers.

    Once again, I’m not sure if I’m responding positively to what you’re saying. I may be crapping on about something that is entirely irrelevant.

  7. Joshuism Says:

    True that.
    You don’t need to respond positively to this, either. If I’m confident in something then I should have no trouble with letting it stand up to examination. (I also know me well enough to know that I can be wrong. So go nuts!)
    There are a couple of bits here. One is, that if God tells us to do something that disagrees with what another well meaning christian puts a lot of energy into telling you is wrong, (or counter to their understanding) then you need to decide who it is better to offend. Which is a fairly obvious answer, although the situation can be quite uncertain.
    Paul tells us not to do things that our brother has been convicted not to do. This is in regards to things that are not necessarily sin in themselves, but are made sin by being disobedience.

    Matthew 5:9 Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God.
    James 3:18 Peacemakers who sow in peace raise a harvest of righteousness.
    I understand what you mean about being called to be peacemakers, but there’s also this to consider:
    Matthew 10:34 “Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword.”
    and also this
    Hebrews 4:12 For the word of God is living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the division of soul and spirit, and of joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

    The problem you and I are bound to encounter is that Christ, the Holy Spirit, and indeed God’s word is EXTREMELY offensive to ‘the flesh’, or mankind’s mindset without God. Of course, it’s also the sweetest thing you could ever hear, all at the same time.

    What is obedience? The first thing that comes to mind is that obedience will stand up to scriptural examination. Obeying God, and what he tells you… that one’s kinda tricky. Satan doesn’t at all mind impersonating God to mess up people as much as he can, because the worst place you can be in is one of believing a lie as truth. And it gets better. Many times in the bible God himself hands people over to their own evil desires, or causes a lying spirit to come over people(even prophets) as judgement for their sin. And then Paul tells us to pray for God to hand people over to the enemy, in order for them to be woken up to what they’re actually doing.
    So listening to the voices in your head isn’t exactly it, either.
    I didn’t go into much detail in the blog, which can often cause discussions like these…

    What can we take from all of this, anyway?
    For one, willful disobedience is a really bad idea.
    If you’re having a discussion with a ‘back-slidden christian’ (which is a fantastic term best used when being very judgmental and attempting to isolate one or more people) (sorry, sarcasm isn’t always obvious in text)

    that went.. somewhere..
    Anyway, having a discussion with someone who confesses christianity but has a very different life to something you or I would feel comfortable with, listen out for an admittance of willful disobedience. You will hear it, it’s always there, sometimes you just have to search a bit. “I used to do this but then I stopped, and it didn’t feel right for a while” which is followed at some stage by “and then the more I thought about it, the more I could see that this was the right way”.
    Willful disobedience is a fantastic way to get yourself into a position of deception.
    There will be a reason. People change because something affected them, be it negative or positive.

    This has turned into a massive reply, that isn’t necessarily on topic. Nevertheless, I’ve gone too far to stop now.

    There’s something else I want to mention.
    Consider Jesus, the most gracious man to walk the earth. Now consider his biggest act of grace, dying on the cross, without fault of his own. Consider him rising from the dead.
    Why is it that we see tolerance as an act of grace? Jesus was gracious, Jesus was humble, but he totally blew through the pharisees (in front of everyone) and went around telling everyone that he was the only way to heaven.
    Thing’s don’t add up, until you look at it from a different angle, with more God-wisdom based definition.
    Humility is crediting to God what is His, and grace…
    The biggest act of grace was the single most offensive act to our unsaved prideful souls.
    The grace of Christ causes men to fall at his feet, begging forgiveness, or cause someone like Peter to actually tell Jesus to leave him alone, because he’s too sinful!(luke 5:8)
    Christ’s grace is NOT allowing someone to live in sin, but rather speaking the truth into them. There’s more than that, of course, because we’re saved by grace, and not truth, but there’s more revelation to be had there, i think…
    Picture grace as the resurrection power of Christ, and you’ll start to see the angle I’m coming from. (if you don’t, much of what I’ve written might be kinda void in the grand scheme of things)
    All that said, I don’t think Jesus ever chased an argument, either.

    There’s a lot in this.


Leave a Reply